Skrapp vs Tomba.io: Why 42.8% Accuracy Isn't Enough in 2026
Skrapp vs Tomba.io compared with real data. Skrapp hits 42.8% accuracy vs Tomba.io's 80.3%. See the proof in public Google Sheets. Tomba is 87.5% better
Would you trust an email finder that fails 57.2% of the time? That's Skrapp's reality. In our independent test of 5,000 queries, Skrapp found valid emails only 42.8% of the time. Tomba.io? 80.3%. That's 87.5% more accurate - and we have the public Google Sheets to prove it.
Let that number settle in. For every 10 emails Skrapp returns, nearly 6 of them are invalid. You're paying real money for data that bounces, damages your sender reputation, and wastes your sales team's time. Skrapp ranks #5 out of 9 tools we tested - right in the middle of the pack, neither great nor terrible. Just... mediocre.
Meanwhile, Tomba.io scored 80.3% accuracy across the same 5,000 queries - finding 1,873 more valid emails than Skrapp. That's not a marginal improvement. Tomba.io is 87.5% more accurate than Skrapp, and every single data point is publicly verifiable in Google Sheets.
But here's what makes this comparison especially interesting: Skrapp appears cheaper at $39/month vs Tomba.io's $49/month. On the surface, Skrapp looks like the budget-friendly choice. But when you calculate the cost per valid email - the only number that actually matters - Tomba.io costs $0.02 per valid email while Skrapp costs $0.039. The "cheaper" tool is actually nearly 2X more expensive per usable result.
This is the most data-driven Skrapp comparison you'll find anywhere. If you're currently using Skrapp - or evaluating it as a skrapp alternative to other tools - the numbers in this article will show you exactly what you're getting and what you're missing. Everything is backed by independently tested, publicly available proof data.
In this comprehensive Skrapp vs Tomba.io comparison, you'll discover:
- The real accuracy numbers - 80.3% vs 42.8%, tested across 5,000 queries with public proof
- Why Skrapp's lower price is a trap - $39/mo sounds good until you see the cost per valid email
- Skrapp's 57.2% failure rate - more than half of all results are worthless
- Where Skrapp actually ranks among 9 tested tools (spoiler: #5 out of 9 - middle of the pack)
- The cost-per-valid-email math that reveals which tool delivers real value
If you're paying $39/month for Skrapp, you're getting 57.2% garbage data and fewer searches than you could be getting with Tomba.io. Here's the proof.
Quick Verdict: Tomba.io Wins Every Category
For readers who want the bottom line before diving into the data:
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Email Accuracy | Tomba.io | 80.3% vs 42.8% - 87.5% more accurate |
| Valid Emails Found | Tomba.io | 4,015 vs 2,142 out of 5,000 queries |
| Search Volume | Tomba.io | 2,500 vs 1,000 monthly searches |
| Email Verification | Tomba.io | 2,500/mo FREE vs limited |
| Cost per Valid Email | Tomba.io | $0.02 vs $0.039 - nearly half the cost |
| Bounce Rate | Tomba.io | <5% vs 57.2% invalid |
| API Access | Tomba.io | All plans vs higher plans |
| Data Transparency | Tomba.io | Full Google Sheets proof vs none |
| Overall | Tomba.io | Clear winner in every single category |
Tomba.io wins every category. Skrapp's only apparent advantage - a $10/month lower price tag - evaporates when you calculate the cost per valid email. This is not a close comparison.
Company Overview: The Budget Pick vs The Accuracy Leader
What is Skrapp?
Skrapp is a B2B email finder tool that focuses on LinkedIn-based prospecting and email discovery. It positions itself as an affordable alternative in the email finder market, with plans starting at $39/month. Skrapp offers email finding, domain search, and basic verification features.

Skrapp Key Facts:
- Focus: LinkedIn email finding and B2B prospecting
- Database: Business email addresses via LinkedIn and domain search
- Email Accuracy: 42.8% (independently verified - ranked #5 out of 9)
- Starting price: $39/month (Starter plan)
- Searches: 1,000/month on Starter
- Email verification: Limited (not fully included)
- API access: Higher plans only
- Chrome extension: Yes (LinkedIn integration)
The Big Problem: Skrapp's $39/month price tag looks attractive until you realize 57.2% of the emails it returns are invalid. At 42.8% accuracy, Skrapp sits squarely in the middle of the pack at #5 out of 9 tools tested. It's not the worst email finder we tested - but it's far from effective. With a 57.2% failure rate, more than half your results are useless, and the "savings" over better tools disappear when you calculate what each valid email actually costs.
What is Tomba.io?
Tomba.io is the #1 most accurate email finder based on independent testing across 9 tools and 5,000 queries. Rather than competing on price alone, Tomba.io focuses on what actually matters: delivering accurate, verified email addresses at scale - and proving it with transparent, auditable data.

Tomba.io Key Facts:
- Focus: Highest accuracy email finding at scale
- Database: 500M+ verified business emails
- Email Accuracy: 80.3% (independently verified - #1 out of 9 tools)
- Starting price: $49/month
- Searches: 2,500/month
- 2,500 free email verifications included on all plans
- Bounce rates below 5%
- Catch-all and unknown email handling
- API access on all plans
- Annual cost: $588/year
Proof Data Available:
- Website search results (81.0% - 2,026/2,500): View full data
- Company name search results (79.6% - 1,989/2,500): View full data
"Accuracy is the foundation of every successful email outreach campaign. A tool that returns 57% invalid emails isn't saving you money - it's wasting it on bounces, damaged sender reputation, and dead-end leads."
-- Email Deliverability Best Practices Report
Head-to-Head Accuracy: The Data That Changes Everything
This is the section that makes the Skrapp vs Tomba.io comparison crystal clear. No marketing claims. No vague promises. Just independently tested data across 5,000 email queries with full public proof.
The Head-to-Head Results
We tested both tools with identical query sets: 2,500 website searches and 2,500 company name searches. Only verified, valid emails were counted. Here are the results:
| Metric | Tomba.io | Skrapp | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Website Search | 2,026 (81.0%) | 1,001 (40.0%) | Tomba.io |
| Company Name Search | 1,989 (79.6%) | 1,141 (45.6%) | Tomba.io |
| Combined Accuracy | 80.3% | 42.8% | Tomba.io (87.5% better) |
| Total Valid Emails | 4,015 / 5,000 | 2,142 / 5,000 | Tomba finds 1,873 more |
Read those numbers carefully. Out of 5,000 identical queries:
- Tomba.io returned 4,015 valid emails (80.3% accuracy)
- Skrapp returned only 2,142 valid emails (42.8% accuracy)
- Tomba.io found 1,873 MORE valid emails than Skrapp
- Tomba.io is 87.5% more accurate than Skrapp
In practical terms, for every 10 emails Skrapp finds, Tomba.io finds nearly 19. Skrapp's 57.2% failure rate means the majority of emails it returns will bounce, get flagged as spam, or simply go nowhere.
Breaking Down the Numbers
Website Search Performance:
Skrapp's website search accuracy is especially concerning at just 40.0% (1,001 valid out of 2,500). That means 6 out of every 10 website-based searches fail. Tomba.io's 81.0% (2,026/2,500) means more than 8 out of 10 succeed. For domain-based prospecting - one of the most common use cases - Skrapp's performance is simply not adequate.
Company Name Search Performance:
Skrapp performs slightly better on company name searches at 45.6% (1,141/2,500), but this is still a 54.4% failure rate. Tomba.io achieves 79.6% (1,989/2,500) on the same queries - nearly double the success rate.
Verify It Yourself: Public Proof Data
Unlike most email finder comparisons that rely on vague claims, every data point in this comparison is publicly verifiable. Here are the raw Google Sheets:
Tomba.io Results:
- Website Search (81.0% - 2,026/2,500): View raw data
- Company Name Search (79.6% - 1,989/2,500): View raw data
Skrapp Results:
- Website Search (40.0% - 1,001/2,500): View raw data
- Company Name Search (45.6% - 1,141/2,500): View raw data
Open the spreadsheets. Check every row. The data speaks for itself. This is the level of transparency you should demand from any email finder before handing over your money.
Full 9-Tool Accuracy Benchmark: Where Skrapp Really Ranks
The head-to-head comparison tells a clear story, but the full 9-tool benchmark puts Skrapp's performance in complete context. When you see where it ranks against the entire field, you understand exactly what "middle of the pack" means.
Complete Accuracy Rankings
| Rank | Tool | Website Search | Company Name Search | Combined Accuracy | vs Tomba.io |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Tomba.io | 81.0% | 79.6% | 80.3% | -- |
| #2 | Anymailfinder | 76.7% | 78.3% | 77.5% | Tomba 3.6% better |
| #3 | Findmail | 75.2% | 75.1% | 75.1% | Tomba 6.9% better |
| #4 | GetProspect | 59.3% | 64.5% | 61.9% | Tomba 29.7% better |
| #5 | Skrapp | 40.0% | 45.6% | 42.8% | Tomba 87.5% better |
| #6 | Hunter.io | 35.5% | 39.8% | 37.6% | Tomba 113% better |
| #7 | VoilaNorbert | 42.0% | 30.0% | 36.0% | Tomba 123% better |
| #8 | Snov.io | 49.5% | 0.8% | 20.1% | Tomba 299% better |
| #9 | Prospeo | 33.0% | 0.9% | 16.9% | Tomba 375% better |

What This Ranking Tells Us
Skrapp ranks #5 out of 9 tools tested. That's exactly middle of the pack. Consider what this means:
- 4 tools outperform Skrapp in combined accuracy, with the top 3 all above 75%
- Skrapp sits in a massive accuracy gap - 19.1 percentage points behind #4 GetProspect (61.9%) and just 5.2 points ahead of #6 Hunter.io (37.6%)
- The #1 tool (Tomba.io) is 87.5% more accurate than Skrapp
- Skrapp's 40.0% website search accuracy is particularly weak - only Hunter.io and Prospeo score lower on website searches
- Skrapp's 45.6% company name search is slightly better but still means more than half of all queries fail
Skrapp occupies the uncomfortable middle ground: not bad enough to be obviously terrible, but not good enough to be recommended. At 42.8%, you're getting results that are only marginally better than a coin flip. For a paid professional tool, "slightly better than random chance" is not an acceptable standard.
"In email prospecting, the difference between 42% and 80% accuracy isn't incremental - it's transformational. One number means your team wastes most of their time on bad data. The other means they spend most of their time on real opportunities."
-- SaaS Procurement Advisory Report
Pricing Comparison: The $39 Trap
Here's where the Skrapp alternative comparison gets really interesting. Skrapp's biggest selling point is its $39/month starting price - $10 less than Tomba.io's $49/month. On the surface, that looks like a clear win for Skrapp. But pricing is meaningless without context, and the context here completely flips the equation.
Monthly Plan Comparison
| Feature | Tomba.io | Skrapp |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $49/mo | $39/mo |
| Searches Included | 2,500/mo | 1,000/mo |
| Email Verifications | 2,500/mo FREE | Limited |
| Accuracy Rate | 80.3% (proven) | 42.8% (proven) |
| Cost per Valid Email | ~$0.02 | ~$0.039 |
| API Access | All plans | Higher plans |
| Google Sheets Proof | Public | None |

The Real Math: Cost Per Valid Email
This is the number that matters. Not the monthly subscription - the cost per valid, usable email address. Because invalid emails cost you nothing but trouble.
| Metric | Tomba.io | Skrapp |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly Cost | $49 | $39 |
| Monthly Searches | 2,500 | 1,000 |
| Accuracy Rate | 80.3% | 42.8% |
| Valid Emails/Month | ~2,008 | ~428 |
| Cost Per Valid Email | $0.02 | $0.039 |
| Verification Cost | $0 (FREE - 2,500/mo) | Extra/Limited |
| True Cost Per Usable Email | ~$0.02 | ~$0.039+ |
| Annual Cost | $588 | $468 + verification fees |
Let's break this down plainly:
- Tomba.io delivers ~2,008 valid emails per month for $49. That's roughly $0.02 per verified, deliverable email.
- Skrapp delivers ~428 valid emails per month for $39. That's roughly $0.039 per email - and you still need to verify many of them separately.
- Tomba.io gives you 4.7X more valid emails for just $10 more per month.
- Skrapp's cost per valid email is nearly 2X higher than Tomba.io's.
The $10 monthly "savings" with Skrapp costs you 1,580 fewer valid emails every month. That's not saving money - that's losing opportunity.
What Your Monthly Investment Actually Gets You
| Scenario | Tomba.io ($49/mo) | Skrapp ($39/mo) |
|---|---|---|
| Daily searches (weekdays) | ~114/day | ~45/day |
| Weekly searches | ~568/week | ~227/week |
| Monthly searches | 2,500 | 1,000 |
| Annual searches | 30,000 | 12,000 |
| Valid emails/month | ~2,008 | ~428 |
| Email verifications | 2,500/mo FREE | Limited |
| Annual cost | $588 | $468 + verification |
At $39/month, Skrapp gives you roughly 45 searches per business day - and based on their 42.8% accuracy, only about 19-20 of those will actually be valid. That's barely enough to prospect a handful of accounts per day.
Tomba.io gives you 114 searches per day with 80.3% accuracy, meaning roughly 92 valid emails daily. That's enough to build real pipelines, run meaningful outreach campaigns, and actually grow your business.
Check Tomba.io pricing to see the complete plan breakdown.
Feature Comparison: 6 Key Battlegrounds
Beyond accuracy and pricing, let's compare the features that matter most when evaluating a Skrapp alternative.
1. Email Finding Accuracy
| Aspect | Tomba.io | Skrapp |
|---|---|---|
| Website search | 81.0% (2,026/2,500) | 40.0% (1,001/2,500) |
| Company name search | 79.6% (1,989/2,500) | 45.6% (1,141/2,500) |
| Combined accuracy | 80.3% | 42.8% |
| Industry ranking | #1 of 9 | #5 of 9 |
| Public proof data | Yes (Google Sheets) | No |
Winner: Tomba.io - 87.5% more accurate with publicly verifiable data. The accuracy gap is enormous.
Use the Tomba Email Finder to see the accuracy difference firsthand.
2. Email Verification
| Aspect | Tomba.io | Skrapp |
|---|---|---|
| Included verifications | 2,500/mo FREE | Limited |
| Catch-all detection | Advanced | Basic |
| Unknown email handling | Yes | No |
| Bulk verification | FREE | Paid/Limited |
| Bounce rate | <5% | Unknown |
| Disposable detection | Yes | Limited |
Winner: Tomba.io - 2,500 free verifications per month vs limited verification capability. This alone could justify the $10 price difference.
Try the Tomba Email Verifier - it's included free with every plan.
3. Search Volume and Value
| Aspect | Tomba.io | Skrapp |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly searches | 2,500 | 1,000 |
| Cost per search | $0.0196 | $0.039 |
| Volume advantage | 2.5X more | -- |
| Valid results per search | 80.3% | 42.8% |
| Effective results/month | ~2,008 valid | ~428 valid |
Winner: Tomba.io - 2.5X more searches with nearly 2X better accuracy means 4.7X more valid results.
4. Domain Search
| Aspect | Tomba.io | Skrapp |
|---|---|---|
| Emails per domain | Up to 100+ | Up to 50 |
| Department filtering | Yes | Limited |
| Confidence scores | Detailed | Basic |
| Real-time verification | Yes | No |
| Company name search | 79.6% accuracy | 45.6% accuracy |
Winner: Tomba.io - More comprehensive domain search with verified results and nearly double the accuracy.
Explore the Tomba Domain Search to see how it works.

5. API Access
| Aspect | Tomba.io | Skrapp |
|---|---|---|
| Available on | All paid plans | Higher plans only |
| Starting price with API | $49/mo | $79/mo+ |
| Documentation | Comprehensive | Basic |
| Rate limits | Generous | Standard |
| Endpoints | Domain, email, verify | Domain, email |
Winner: Tomba.io - API access on all plans at $49/mo. Skrapp restricts API to more expensive plans.
Explore the full Tomba.io API documentation to see the integration possibilities.
6. Chrome Extension
| Aspect | Tomba.io | Skrapp |
|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn integration | Full | Full |
| Auto-verification | Yes | No |
| Free monthly searches | 25 | 50 |
| Speed | Instant | Standard |
| Accuracy | 80.3% verified | 42.8% verified |
Winner: Tomba.io - Same browser experience, but with auto-verification and 87.5% better accuracy behind it. Skrapp offers more free searches, but the accuracy difference means Tomba's 25 free searches deliver more valid results than Skrapp's 50.
Get the Tomba Chrome Extension for instant LinkedIn prospecting with built-in verification.

The Hidden Cost of Skrapp's 57.2% Failure Rate
Skrapp's 42.8% accuracy means 57.2% of the emails it returns are invalid. That's not just a mediocre number - it has real consequences that cost you far more than the $39 monthly subscription.
Consequence 1: Destroyed Sender Reputation
Email service providers (ESPs) like Gmail, Outlook, and corporate servers track your bounce rate. When you consistently send to invalid addresses, your sender reputation plummets. The industry standard threshold is typically 2-5% bounce rate before ESPs start flagging your domain.
With Skrapp's 57.2% invalid rate, you're not just above the threshold - you're more than 11X over it. The result? Your legitimate emails start landing in spam. Your outreach campaigns stop working. Your domain reputation can take months to recover.
Tomba.io's <5% bounce rate keeps you safely within ESP guidelines, protecting your sender reputation and ensuring your emails actually reach inboxes.
Consequence 2: Wasted Sales Team Hours
Every invalid email your SDR encounters is wasted time. They compose the message, hit send, wait for a response that never comes, and eventually get a bounce notification. Multiply that by hundreds of emails per month.
With 1,000 Skrapp searches at 42.8% accuracy, your team gets roughly 428 valid contacts. The other 572 are dead ends. Your SDRs waste hours chasing ghosts.
With 2,500 Tomba.io searches at 80.3% accuracy, your team gets ~2,008 valid contacts - verified before they even start writing.
Consequence 3: The False Economy
Skrapp's $39/month price creates a false sense of savings. You think you're saving $10/month compared to Tomba.io. But here's what that "$10 savings" actually costs you:
- 1,580 fewer valid emails per month (2,008 vs 428)
- No included verification (Tomba includes 2,500/mo free)
- Higher cost per valid email ($0.039 vs $0.02)
- 57.2% wasted queries vs 19.7% with Tomba
The $10 you "save" with Skrapp actually costs you $120/year while delivering 18,960 fewer valid emails annually. That works out to paying $120 to lose 18,960 valid contacts. Not a great trade.
Consequence 4: Misleading Pipeline Data
If your CRM is full of contacts sourced from Skrapp, 57.2% of those contacts have invalid email addresses. Your pipeline looks half full, but more than half of it is hollow. Sales forecasts based on unreliable contact data lead to missed quotas and frustrated leadership.
Tomba.io includes free verification on all plans. Every email returned by Tomba's email finder has already been verified. No extra tools. No extra cost. No hollow pipeline.
"A 57% failure rate from an email finder isn't a bargain - it's a tax on your sales team's productivity. Every invalid email wastes time, damages reputation, and creates false confidence in bad data. The real cost is always higher than the subscription price."
-- Data Quality Management Report
Real-World Impact: Three Scenarios
Let's see how the Tomba.io vs Skrapp difference plays out in real use cases.
Use Case 1: B2B Sales Outreach
Scenario: An SDR team of 3 people needs to find prospect emails for cold outreach campaigns.
| Metric | Tomba.io ($49/mo) | Skrapp ($39/mo) |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly searches | 2,500 | 1,000 |
| Valid emails found | ~2,008 (80.3%) | ~428 (42.8%) |
| Per SDR/month | ~669 valid leads | ~143 valid leads |
| Per SDR/day | ~30 valid leads | ~6 valid leads |
| Verification | 2,500/mo FREE | Limited |
| Bounce rate | <5% | 57.2% |
| Result | Full pipeline, healthy sender rep | Thin pipeline, damaged reputation |
An SDR using Skrapp can realistically prospect 6 verified contacts per day. With Tomba.io, they can reach 30 verified contacts per day. That's the difference between struggling to fill a pipeline and having a robust, growing one.
Use Case 2: Content Marketing Outreach
Scenario: Marketing team running outreach for guest posting, backlinks, and influencer partnerships across 300 target domains.
| Metric | Tomba.io | Skrapp |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly searches | 2,500 | 1,000 |
| Domains researched | 300+ easily | 300 (uses entire allocation for ~3 contacts each) |
| Valid contacts found | ~2,008 | ~428 |
| Follow-up searches | 2,200+ remaining | 0 remaining |
| Verification | 2,500/mo FREE | Limited |
| Campaign viability | Full scale with follow-ups | One pass, no follow-ups |
Content marketing outreach requires volume and persistence. You need to contact multiple people at each target domain, follow up on non-responses, and find alternative contacts when emails bounce. With 1,000 searches and 42.8% accuracy, Skrapp barely gets you through the target list with minimal contacts per domain - and no budget for follow-ups or alternatives.
Use Case 3: Recruiting Campaign
Scenario: Recruiter sourcing candidates for 4 open technical roles.
| Metric | Tomba.io | Skrapp |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly searches | 2,500 | 1,000 |
| Valid candidate contacts | ~2,008 | ~428 |
| Per open role | ~502 valid contacts | ~107 valid contacts |
| Verification | 2,500/mo FREE | Limited |
| Can source at scale? | Yes | Barely |
Recruiting 4 roles simultaneously requires sourcing 150+ candidates per role to fill positions efficiently. That's 600 valid contacts minimum. Skrapp's monthly output of ~428 valid contacts barely covers the minimum - and that assumes every single search targets the right candidates. Tomba.io handles all 4 roles comfortably with capacity to spare.
Why "Cheaper" Doesn't Mean Better Value
Skrapp's main competitive argument is its price. At $39/month, it undercuts most email finders on sticker price. But in B2B tools, the cheapest option is rarely the best value. Here's why:
The Price Illusion
When you compare $39/month (Skrapp) vs $49/month (Tomba.io), Skrapp appears to save you $10/month or $120/year. That's the surface-level comparison most buyers make. But the surface-level comparison is misleading.
The real comparison:
| What You Actually Get | Tomba.io ($49/mo) | Skrapp ($39/mo) |
|---|---|---|
| Valid emails per dollar | 41 valid emails per $1 | 11 valid emails per $1 |
| Annual valid emails | ~24,096 | ~5,136 |
| Annual cost | $588 | $468 + verification |
| Cost per 1,000 valid emails | $24.40 | $91.12 |
| Verification included | 30,000/year FREE | Limited |
Tomba.io delivers 3.7X more valid emails per dollar spent. The "savings" from Skrapp's lower price are completely offset by its lower accuracy and smaller search volume.
The Verification Gap
Tomba.io includes 2,500 email verifications per month (30,000/year) for free. Skrapp's verification is limited. If you need to verify Skrapp's results with a third-party tool, add another $30-100/month to your actual costs. That brings Skrapp's effective price to $69-139/month - significantly more than Tomba.io's $49/month with everything included.
The Opportunity Cost
Every valid email you miss is a potential customer, partner, or candidate you never reach. Skrapp's 57.2% failure rate means you're missing more than half of all potential contacts. At scale, that's thousands of missed opportunities per year.
"The cheapest tool is the one that delivers the most value per dollar - not the one with the lowest price tag. When you factor in accuracy, volume, and included features, the tool that costs $10 more per month can deliver 4-5X more value."
-- B2B Technology Evaluation Report
Email Verification: Included vs Extra Cost
This is one of the most important differences between Tomba.io and Skrapp - and one of the most overlooked.
Verification Comparison
| Feature | Tomba.io | Skrapp |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly Verifications | 2,500 FREE | Limited |
| Verification Accuracy | 99%+ | Standard |
| Bounce Rate After Verify | <5% | Unknown |
| Catch-All Detection | Advanced | Basic |
| Unknown Email Handling | Yes | No |
| Disposable Detection | Yes | Limited |
| Bulk Verification | FREE | Paid/Limited |
Why This Matters More Than You Think
With Skrapp, you get 1,000 searches per month. Given its 42.8% accuracy, roughly 572 of those results are invalid. Without robust verification built in, you have three choices:
- Use a third-party verifier (another subscription - $30-100/month)
- Manually check each email (hours of wasted time)
- Send to unverified emails (and accept the 57.2% bounce rate)
None of these options are good. You're either paying more money, wasting time, or destroying your sender reputation.
With Tomba.io, every email returned by the email finder and domain search can be verified through the included 2,500 monthly verifications. The email verifier is built into every plan. You know exactly which emails are valid, catch-all, unknown, or invalid before you send a single message.
Tomba.io Verification Status Codes
Tomba.io provides detailed verification for every email:
- Valid - Safe to send, email exists and is deliverable
- Catch-All - Domain accepts all emails, handled intelligently by Tomba's algorithms
- Unknown - Advanced verification algorithms assess difficult-to-check addresses
- Invalid - Do not send, will bounce
- Disposable - Temporary email address, avoid for business outreach
This level of detail means you can make informed decisions about every contact in your pipeline - something Skrapp's limited verification simply doesn't offer at the same level.
How to Switch from Skrapp to Tomba.io
Making the switch is straightforward, and you'll feel the difference from day one.
Step 1: Sign Up for Tomba.io Free
Start with Tomba.io's free plan - 25 free searches, no credit card required. Experience the accuracy difference before you commit a single dollar.
Step 2: Run the Same Searches
Take your most recent Skrapp searches and run the same queries in Tomba.io. Compare the results side by side. You'll immediately see more valid emails returned, and the verification status will show you exactly which ones are safe to send.
Step 3: Test the Verification
Use the Tomba Email Verifier to check emails from both tools. You'll quickly see why Tomba.io's 80.3% accuracy with free verification beats Skrapp's 42.8% accuracy with limited verification.
Step 4: Install the Chrome Extension
Get the Tomba Chrome Extension for instant LinkedIn prospecting. It works similarly to Skrapp's extension but delivers 87.5% better accuracy with built-in verification.
Step 5: Connect via API
Tomba.io's API is available on all plans at $49/month - unlike Skrapp, which restricts API access to higher-tier plans. Explore the full API documentation at developer.tomba.io to integrate with your existing workflow.
Step 6: Scale Your Outreach
With 2,500 searches per month and 2,500 free verifications (vs Skrapp's 1,000 searches with limited verification), you can prospect at the scale your pipeline demands. No more rationing searches. No more paying extra for verification. Just accurate, verified email data at 2.5X the volume with 87.5% better accuracy.
Most teams that switch from Skrapp to Tomba.io report seeing the difference within the first day. The combination of higher accuracy, more searches, and free verification is immediately apparent.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Tomba.io really 87.5% more accurate than Skrapp?
Yes - and the proof is public. Tomba.io achieves 80.3% combined accuracy (Website 81.0% with 2,026/2,500 valid + Company Name 79.6% with 1,989/2,500 valid) vs Skrapp's 42.8% combined accuracy (Website 40.0% with 1,001/2,500 valid + Company Name 45.6% with 1,141/2,500 valid). That makes Tomba.io 87.5% more accurate. Both tools were tested with identical 5,000-query benchmark sets, and the full results are available in public Google Sheets: Tomba Website, Tomba Company, Skrapp Website, Skrapp Company.
But Skrapp is cheaper at $39/month - isn't that better?
Only if you ignore the cost per valid email. Skrapp's $39/month gets you 1,000 searches at 42.8% accuracy = ~428 valid emails at $0.039 each. Tomba.io's $49/month gets you 2,500 searches at 80.3% accuracy = ~2,008 valid emails at $0.02 each. For $10 more per month, you get 4.7X more valid emails and 2,500 free verifications. The "cheaper" tool is actually nearly 2X more expensive per usable result.
Where does Skrapp rank among email finders?
Skrapp ranks #5 out of 9 tools in our independent accuracy benchmark. It sits in the middle of the pack - behind Tomba.io (#1, 80.3%), Anymailfinder (#2, 77.5%), Findmail (#3, 75.1%), and GetProspect (#4, 61.9%). Skrapp's 42.8% accuracy means it outperforms Hunter.io, VoilaNorbert, Snov.io, and Prospeo, but its 57.2% failure rate means more than half of all results are invalid.
Does Skrapp include email verification?
Skrapp's verification is limited compared to Tomba.io. Tomba.io includes 2,500 email verifications per month free on all plans, with advanced catch-all detection, unknown email handling, disposable email detection, and bulk verification. This is a significant difference because without robust verification, you're either paying extra for a third-party tool or sending to potentially invalid addresses - both of which increase your real costs.
How can I verify these accuracy claims myself?
Every data point is publicly available. Open any of the Google Sheets links in this article and you'll see the raw test data - every query, every result, every verification status. You can also run your own comparison: sign up for Tomba.io's free plan (25 free searches, no credit card), search for contacts you already know, and compare the results against Skrapp. The accuracy difference is immediately obvious.
The Final Verdict: Tomba.io Is the Clear Skrapp Alternative
After this comprehensive Skrapp vs Tomba.io comparison, the data paints an unmistakable picture:
| Category | Winner | The Numbers |
|---|---|---|
| Email Accuracy | Tomba.io | 80.3% vs 42.8% (87.5% better) |
| Valid Emails Found | Tomba.io | 4,015 vs 2,142 (1,873 more per 5,000) |
| Monthly Searches | Tomba.io | 2,500 vs 1,000 (2.5X more) |
| Email Verifications | Tomba.io | 2,500/mo FREE vs limited |
| Cost Per Valid Email | Tomba.io | $0.02 vs $0.039 (nearly half) |
| Bounce Rate | Tomba.io | <5% vs 57.2% invalid |
| Industry Ranking | Tomba.io | #1 of 9 vs #5 of 9 |
| API Access | Tomba.io | All plans vs higher plans only |
| Data Transparency | Tomba.io | Full public proof vs none |
Skrapp is the budget email finder. Tomba.io is the value email finder.
At just $10 more per month, Tomba.io delivers 2.5X more searches, 87.5% better accuracy, 2,500 free email verifications, and API access on all plans. Skrapp's lower price tag cannot compensate for a 57.2% failure rate, a #5 ranking out of 9 tools, and limited verification that forces you to pay extra or accept bad data.
The data is public. The proof is verifiable. The decision is clear.
"Don't choose the cheapest tool - choose the one that delivers the most value per dollar. In the email finder market, a $10 monthly savings that costs you 1,580 valid emails per month isn't a deal. It's a trap."
-- B2B Technology Evaluation Report
Ready to Get 87.5% Better Accuracy and Real Value?
Tomba.io delivers 80.3% accuracy - independently verified and ranked #1 out of 9 tools. At $49/month with 2,500 searches and 2,500 free verifications, you're getting 4.7X more valid emails than Skrapp with 87.5% better accuracy for just $10 more per month.
Stop sending to invalid emails. Stop paying per valid email at nearly 2X the rate. Stop settling for a tool that ranks #5 out of 9 with a 57.2% failure rate.
Start using the #1 email finder.
Start Finding Emails That Actually Work
No credit card required. 25 free searches included.
See what 80.3% accuracy, 2,500 searches, and 2,500 free verifications per month feels like.